Current:Home > ContactIllinois appeals court to hear arguments on Jussie Smollett request to toss convictions -Thrive Success Strategies
Illinois appeals court to hear arguments on Jussie Smollett request to toss convictions
View
Date:2025-04-13 07:16:22
CHICAGO (AP) — Jussie Smollett’s drawn out legal saga begins anew Tuesday when an Illinois appeals court will hear oral arguments that the former “Empire” actor’s convictions for staging a racist, homophobic attack against himself in 2019 and then lying about it to Chicago police should be tossed.
If the appeal before the Chicago-based First District Appellate Court fails, Smollett would have to finish a 150-day stint in jail that his trial judge ordered during his 2022 sentencing. Smollett spent just six days in jail before his release pending the outcome of the appeal. A ruling is expected to take several weeks.
Among a long list of arguments in the 76-page written appeal from Smollett’s lawyers is that his 2021 trial violated his Fifth Amendment protections against double jeopardy — being punished for the same crime twice. It says he already performed community service and forfeited a $10,000 bond as part of a 2019 deal with the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office to drop the initial charges.
Smollett, who is Black and gay, was the target of a racist justice system and people playing politics, Nenye Uche, one of his lawyers, told reporters last year. Uche criticized special prosecutor Dan Webb’s decision to press for new charges in 2020. He also called the trial judge’s sentence excessive for a low-level felony.
In the appeal, Smollett’s legal team says chief prosecutor Kim Foxx’s office used proper discretion to drop the original charges four years ago.
“If Mr. Smollett’s convictions are allowed to stand, this case will set a dangerous precedent by giving prosecutors a second bite at the apple any time there is dissatisfaction with another prosecutor’s exercise of discretion,” the appeal says.
A 55-page response from the special prosecutor says the way the agreement with Foxx’s office was structured clearly left open the possibility of recharging Smollett without violating protections against double jeopardy.
“Smollett’s attacks on the validity of his prosecution are legally and factually unsupported,” it says.
In January 2019, during a bitterly cold day in Chicago, Smollett reported to police that he was the victim of a racist and homophobic attack by two men wearing ski masks. The manhunt for the attackers soon turned into an investigation of Smollett himself, leading to his arrest on charges that he’d orchestrated the attack himself.
Authorities said Smollett paid two men he knew from work on the TV show “Empire” to stage the attack. Prosecutors said he told them what racist and homophobic slurs to shout, and to yell that Smollett was in “MAGA Country,” a reference to the campaign slogan of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.
A jury convicted Smollett in 2021 on five felony counts of disorderly conduct — the charge filed when a person lies to police. He was acquitted on a sixth count.
In 2022, Cook County Judge James Linn sentenced Smollett to 30 months of felony probation, with 150 days served in Cook County Jail, and ordered that he pay $120,106 in restitution to the city of Chicago and a $25,000 fine.
As he sentenced Smollett, Judge Linn excoriated him as a narcissist and pronounced himself astounded by Smollett’s actions given the actor’s multiracial family background and ties to social justice work.
During sentencing and as Smollett was led away to jail, he shouted that he was innocent, warning the judge that he was not suicidal and if he died in custody it was somebody else who would have taken his life.
___
Check out The AP’s complete coverage of the Jussie Smollett case.
veryGood! (7281)
Related
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- Barney the purple dinosaur is coming back with a new show — and a new look
- RHONJ's Teresa Giudice Addresses Shaky Marriage Rumors Ahead of First Anniversary
- How Kim Kardashian Really Feels About Hater Kourtney Kardashian Amid Feud
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- Upset Ohio town residents seek answers over train derailment
- Collin Gosselin Pens Message of Gratitude to Dad Jon Amid New Chapter
- We're talking about the 4-day workweek — again. Is it a mirage or reality?
- Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
- Tesla recalls nearly 363,000 cars with 'Full Self-Driving' to fix flaws in behavior
Ranking
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- Is the Controlled Shrinking of Economies a Better Bet to Slow Climate Change Than Unproven Technologies?
- Nordstrom Rack Currently Has Limited-Time Under $50 Deals on Hundreds of Bestselling Dresses
- The social cost of carbon: a powerful tool and ethics nightmare
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- Rep. Ayanna Pressley on student loans, the Supreme Court and Biden's reelection - The Takeout
- An Indigenous Group’s Objection to Geoengineering Spurs a Debate About Social Justice in Climate Science
- California’s Relentless Droughts Strain Farming Towns
Recommendation
The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
A deal's a deal...unless it's a 'yo-yo' car sale
Q&A: Sustainable Farming Expert Weighs in on California’s Historic Investments in ‘Climate Smart’ Agriculture
In a New Policy Statement, the Nation’s Physicists Toughen Their Stance on Climate Change, Stressing Its Reality and Urgency
What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
Inside Clean Energy: In South Carolina, a Happy Compromise on Net Metering
20,000 roses, inflation and night terrors: the life of a florist on Valentine's Day
‘There Are No Winners Here’: Drought in the Klamath Basin Inflames a Decades-Old War Over Water and Fish