Current:Home > NewsThe EPA is proposing that 'forever chemicals' be considered hazardous substances -Thrive Success Strategies
The EPA is proposing that 'forever chemicals' be considered hazardous substances
View
Date:2025-04-16 06:46:39
The Environmental Protection Agency is proposing that nine PFAS, also known as "forever chemicals," be categorized as hazardous to human health.
The EPA signed a proposal Wednesday that would deem the chemicals "hazardous constituents" under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
For the agency to consider a substance a hazardous constituent, it has to be toxic or cause cancer, genetic mutation or the malformations of an embryo. The full list of the nine substances can be found here.
The agency cited various studies in which forever chemicals were found to cause a litany of "toxic effects" in humans and animals, including, but not limited to cancer, a decreased response to vaccinations, high cholesterol, decrease in fertility in women, preeclampsia, thyroid disorders and asthma, the EPA said.
Short for "per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances," PFAS cover thousands of man-made chemicals. PFAS are often used for manufacturing purposes, such as in nonstick cookware, adhesives, firefighting foam, turf and more.
PFAS have been called "forever chemicals" because they break down very slowly and can accumulate in people, animals and the environment. Last summer, a study by the U.S. Geological Survey found that the man-made chemicals are present in nearly half the country's tap water supply.
The survey tested for 32 types of PFAS, though there are more than 12,000, the USGS said, and they can pose a health threat even at very small amounts.
In June, the chemical manufacturer 3M said it would pay about $10 billion in lawsuit settlements to help detoxify water supplies across the country, after plaintiffs claimed the company's firefighting foam and other products were responsible for contaminating tap water with PFAS.
The proposed rule will be open for public comment once it is uploaded to the Federal Register, under docket number EPA-HQ-OLEM-2023-0278.
veryGood! (66)
Related
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- Is 70 the best age to claim Social Security? Not in these 3 situations.
- Taylor Swift fan captures video of film crew following her onstage at London Eras Tour
- Maurice Williams, writer and lead singer of ‘Stay,’ dead at 86
- Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
- Florida primary will set US Senate race but largely focus on state and local races
- Counting All the Members of the Duggars' Growing Family
- Jonathan Bailey Has a NSFW Confession About His Prosthetic Penis for TV
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- Authorities investigate death of airman based in New Mexico
Ranking
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- College football begins next weekend with No. 10 Florida State facing Georgia Tech in Ireland
- Benefit Cosmetics Just Dropped Its 2024 Holiday Beauty Advent Calendar, Filled with Bestselling Favorites
- What the VP picks says about what Harris and Trump want for America's kids
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- Taylor Swift Shares How She Handles Sad or Bad Days Following Terror Plot
- Jana Duggar, oldest Duggar daughter, marries Stephen Wissmann: 'Dream come true'
- Springtime Rain Crucial for Getting Wintertime Snowmelt to the Colorado River, Study Finds
Recommendation
Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
Watch: Patrick Mahomes makes behind-the-back pass after Travis Kelce messes up route
Jonathan Bailey's Fate on Bridgerton Season 4 Revealed
Are there cheaper versions of the $300+ Home Depot Skelly? See 5 skeleton decor alternatives
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Watch: Dallas Cowboys kicker Brandon Aubrey nails 66-yard field goal
Detroit-area mall guards face trial in man’s death more than 10 years later
Are there cheaper versions of the $300+ Home Depot Skelly? See 5 skeleton decor alternatives