Current:Home > ScamsAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -Thrive Success Strategies
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-13 14:44:15
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (8569)
Related
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- 13 Things From Goop's $159,273+ Father's Day Gift Guide We'd Actually Buy
- Captain Lee Rosbach Shares Update on His Health, Life After Below Deck and His Return to TV
- Oleksandr Usyk-Tyson Fury heavyweight title rematch scheduled for Dec. 21
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- At Sen. Bob Menendez’s bribery trial, prosecutors highlight his wife’s desperate finances
- Oleksandr Usyk-Tyson Fury heavyweight title rematch scheduled for Dec. 21
- Open AI CEO Sam Altman and husband promise to donate half their wealth to charity
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- South Carolina’s Supreme Court will soon have no Black justices
Ranking
- All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
- Suspect indicted in Alabama killings of 3 family members, friend
- New Hampshire’s limits on teaching on race and gender are unconstitutional, judge says
- Órla Baxendale's Family Sues Over Her Death From Alleged Mislabeled Cookie
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- Pat Sajak celebrates 'Wheel of Fortune' contestant's mistake: 'We get to keep the money!'
- There aren't enough mental health counselors to respond to 911 calls. One county sheriff has a virtual solution.
- Michigan willing to spend millions to restore Flint properties ripped up by pipe replacement
Recommendation
Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
Michigan willing to spend millions to restore Flint properties ripped up by pipe replacement
'Came out of nowhere': Storm-weary Texas bashed again; 400,000 without power
Get 82% Off Khloé Kardashian's Good American, 30% Off Parachute, 70% Off Disney & Today's Best Deals
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
The Daily Money: Hate speech on Facebook?
How many points did Caitlin Clark score tonight? Career-high total not enough vs. Sparks
New Louisiana law will criminalize approaching police under certain circumstances