Current:Home > InvestSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -Thrive Success Strategies
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-17 07:50:02
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (45951)
Related
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- Hamas releases video of injured Israeli-American hostage Hersh Goldberg-Polin
- Forever Young looks to give Japan first Kentucky Derby win. Why he could be colt to do it
- Amendments to Missouri Constitution are on the line amid GOP infighting
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- What age are women having babies? What the falling fertility rate tells us.
- Alabama sets July execution date for man convicted of killing delivery driver
- Will Power denies participating in Penske cheating scandal. Silence from Josef Newgarden
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- Reggie Bush plans to continue his fight against the NCAA after the return of his Heisman Trophy
Ranking
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- Selling weight-loss and muscle-building supplements to minors in New York is now illegal
- Watch family members reunite with soldiers after 9 months of waiting
- Jeezy Denies Ex Jeannie Mai's Deeply Disturbing Abuse Allegations
- Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
- Alabama lawmakers advance bill that could lead to prosecution of librarians
- These people were charged with interfering in the 2020 election. Some are still in politics today
- The Simpsons Kills Off Original Character After 35 Seasons
Recommendation
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
Christine Quinn Accuses Ex of Planting Recording Devices and a Security Guard at Home in Emergency Filing
William Decker: Founder of Wealth Forge Institute
Kim Kardashian joins VP Harris to discuss criminal justice reform
Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
Caitlin Clark Shares Sweet Glimpse at Romance With Boyfriend Connor McCaffery
NFL draft order Friday: Who drafts when for second and third rounds of 2024 NFL draft
Reggie Bush plans to continue his fight against the NCAA after the return of his Heisman Trophy