Current:Home > MarketsSupreme Court agrees to review Texas age verification law for porn sites -Thrive Success Strategies
Supreme Court agrees to review Texas age verification law for porn sites
Ethermac Exchange View
Date:2025-04-08 00:57:19
Washington — The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it will consider a challenge to a Texas law that requires pornographic websites to verify the ages of their visitors.
The dispute centers around Texas House Bill 1181, which was enacted in June 2023 and aims to prevent minors from accessing sexual content online. The law requires any website that publishes a certain amount of "sexual material harmful to minors" to verify that every user attempting to access the content is at least 18 years old.
Websites covered by the law must also display health warnings about the alleged psychological risks of pornography. Search engines and social media platforms are effectively exempt from the law's requirements. Violators may face up to $10,000 per day in civil penalties, and if a minor accesses sexual material, the Texas attorney general can seek an additional $250,000 per violation.
Similar age-verification laws are in effect in seven other states — Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, North Carolina, Utah and Virginia — and are scheduled to take effect in several more in the coming months.
The legal fight
The Free Speech Coalition, a trade association for the adult entertainment industry, and a group of companies that operate pornography websites challenged the Texas law before it was set to take effect on Sept. 1, 2023, arguing it infringes on their First Amendment rights. A federal district court agreed to block the law's enforcement one day before it was set to go into force.
Senior U.S. District Court Judge David Alan Ezra said the age-verification requirement likely violates the First Amendment, in part because it restricts adults' access to constitutionally protected speech based on the material's content. The judge concluded that the law is overbroad and overly restrictive.
By verifying information through government identification, Ezra said the law "will allow the government to peer into the most intimate and personal aspects of people's lives" and risks forcing people to "divulge specific details of their sexuality to the state government to gain access to certain speech."
Texas appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, which allowed the state to enforce the law while it reviewed the district court's ruling. In March, a three-judge panel of judges upheld the injunction as to the health warnings and disclosure requirements, finding it unconstitutionally compels the adult websites' speech.
But the panel divided 2-1 to find that the challengers were unlikely to succeed on their challenge to the age-verification portions. The majority disagreed with the district court about the level of scrutiny it applied, and said the proper standard was rational-basis review, the minimum level of scrutiny for determining the constitutionality of a law.
Applying that level of judicial scrutiny, the two judges found that the age-verification requirement is "rationally related to the government's legitimate interest in preventing minors' access to pornography" and therefore doesn't violate the First Amendment.
Judge Patrick Higginbotham dissented as to the age-verification requirements, writing that the provision "cannot be reasonably read to reach only obscene speech in the hands of minors."
"H.B. 1181 limits access to materials that may be denied to minors but remain constitutionally protected speech for adults," he wrote. "It follows that the law must face strict scrutiny review because it limits adults' access to protected speech using a content-based distinction—whether that speech is harmful to minors."
The 5th Circuit declined to pause its ruling while the Free Speech Coalition and adult websites appealed to the Supreme Court. The challengers also sought emergency relief from the high court, which declined to block the law while it considered whether to take up the coalition's appeal.
In urging the Supreme Court to intervene, the websites and trade group argued that the 5th Circuit's ruling "openly defies" its precedent and is at odds with the decisions from other appeals courts that have reviewed laws similar to Texas'.
"This case presents a far-reaching question about government efforts to burden disfavored expression of the kind this court has repeatedly deemed worthy of review — in its leading sexual-content cases and many others," lawyers for the challengers told the Supreme Court in a filing.
While the restriction seeks to shield minors from sexually explicit online content, they argue the law burdens adults' access to expression that is protected by the First Amendment. The measure, the Free Speech Coalition and adult websites claim, requires every user, including adults, to submit personal information to access sensitive content over the Internet, exposing them to leaks, hacks or other security risks.
Texas officials, meanwhile, defended the law and said its challengers are attempting to nullify the state's efforts to protect minors from being exposed to sexually explicit content.
The law, they said in a filing, "simply requires the pornography industry that makes billions of dollars from trafficking in obscenity to take commercially reasonable steps to ensure that those who access the material are adults. Nothing about that requirement is exceptional."
Arguments in the case will be held in the Supreme Court's next term, which begins in October.
Melissa QuinnMelissa Quinn is a politics reporter for CBSNews.com. She has written for outlets including the Washington Examiner, Daily Signal and Alexandria Times. Melissa covers U.S. politics, with a focus on the Supreme Court and federal courts.
TwitterveryGood! (4)
Related
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- Romanian gymnast Ana Bărbosu gets Olympic medal amid Jordan Chiles controversy
- Orange County police uncover secret drug lab with 300,000 fentanyl pills
- No. 1 brothers? Ethan Holliday could join Jackson, make history in 2025 MLB draft
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- US Navy helicopter crew members injured in Nevada training mishap released from hospital
- US official says Mideast mediators are preparing for implementation of cease-fire deal in advance
- Mega Millions winning numbers for August 16 drawing: Jackpot climbs to $498 million
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Taylor Swift Shares How She Handles Sad or Bad Days Following Terror Plot
Ranking
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- Florida primary will set US Senate race but largely focus on state and local races
- Heart disease is rampant in parts of the rural South. Researchers are hitting the road to learn why
- 17 Target Home Essentials for an It Girl Fall—Including a Limited Edition Stanley Cup in Trendy Fall Hues
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Texas Rodeo Roper Ace Patton Ashford Dead at 18 After Getting Dragged by Horse
- Chris Pratt Honors His and Anna Faris' Wonderful Son Jack in 12th Birthday Tribute
- Sydney Sweeney's Cheeky Thirst Trap Is Immaculate
Recommendation
Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
Jerry Rice is letting son Brenden make his own name in NFL with Chargers
Former Alabama police sergeant pleads guilty to excessive force charge
The Daily Money: Does a Disney+ subscription mean you can't sue Disney?
See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
Save up to 50% on premier cookware this weekend at Sur La Table
Dirt-racing legend Scott Bloomquist dies Friday in plane crash in Tennessee
Wait, what does 'price gouging' mean? How Harris plans to control it in the grocery aisle