Current:Home > MyX marks the lawsuit: Elon Musk’s social media company sues nonprofit highlighting site’s hate speech -Thrive Success Strategies
X marks the lawsuit: Elon Musk’s social media company sues nonprofit highlighting site’s hate speech
View
Date:2025-04-17 15:24:51
WASHINGTON (AP) — X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, has sued a group of researchers — alleging their work highlighting an increase in hate speech on the platform cost the company millions of dollars of advertising revenue.
The suit, filed late Monday night in U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California, accuses the nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate of violating X’s terms of service by improperly collecting a vast amount of data for its analysis. The suit also alleges, without offering evidence, that the organization is funded by foreign governments and media companies who view X as competition.
The legal fight between the tech company, which was acquired by Elon Musk last year, and the center could have significant implications for a growing number of researchers and advocacy groups that seek to help the public understand how social media is shaping society and culture.
With offices in the U.S. and United Kingdom, the center regularly publishes reports on hate speech, extremism and harmful behavior on social media platforms like X, TikTok or Facebook. The organization has published several reports critical of Musk’s leadership, detailing an increase in anti-LGBTQ hate speech as well as climate misinformation since his purchase.
In its lawsuit, X alleges the center violated its terms of service by automatically scraping large amounts of data from the site without the company’s permission. X also claims the center improperly accessed internal Twitter data, using log-on credentials it obtained from an employee at a separate company that has a business relationship with X.
Without naming any individuals or companies, the suit says the center receives funding from foreign governments as well as organizations with ties to “legacy media organizations” that see X as a rival.
The suit claims the center’s work has cost X tens of millions of dollars in lost ad revenue.
In response to the legal action, Imran Ahmed, the center’s founder and CEO, defended its work and accused Musk of using the lawsuit to silence criticism of his leadership, as well as research into the role X plays in spreading misinformation and hate speech.
“Musk is trying to ‘shoot the messenger’ who highlights the toxic content on his platform rather than deal with the toxic environment he’s created,” Ahmed said.
The center’s 2021 tax forms show it took in $1.4 million in revenue. A review of major donors shows several large charities, including the National Philanthropic Trust in the U.S. and the Oak Foundation and Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust in the U.K.
A spokesman for the group said the center receives no funding from any government entities or tech companies that could be considered competitors to X. The identities of other donors is not revealed in public documents, and the center declined to provide a list.
Musk is a self-professed free speech absolutist who has welcomed back white supremacists and election deniers to the platform, which he renamed X last month. He initially had promised that he would allow any speech on his platform that wasn’t illegal. “I hope that even my worst critics remain on Twitter, because that is what free speech means,” Musk wrote in a tweet last year.
Nevertheless, the billionaire has at times proven sensitive about critical speech directed at him or his companies. Last year, he suspended the accounts of several journalists who covered his takeover of Twitter.
__
Associated Press writer Thalia Beatty contributed to this report.
veryGood! (8247)
Related
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- Midwest Flooding Exposes Another Oil Pipeline Risk — on Keystone XL’s Route
- In the San Joaquin Valley, Nothing is More Valuable than Water (Part 2)
- A Timeline of Sarah Jessica Parker and Kim Cattrall's Never-Ending Sex and the City Feud
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Midwest Flooding Exposes Another Oil Pipeline Risk — on Keystone XL’s Route
- Princess Eugenie Gives Birth, Welcomes Baby No. 2 With Husband Jack Brooksbank
- Supreme Court blocks student loan forgiveness plan, dealing blow to Biden
- Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
- Christine King Farris, sister of Martin Luther King Jr., dies at age 95
Ranking
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Illinois Passes Tougher Rules on Toxic Coal Ash Over Risks to Health and Rivers
- Jessie J Pays Tribute to Her Boyfriend After Welcoming Baby Boy
- The US Rejoins the Paris Agreement, but Rebuilding Credibility on Climate Action Will Take Time
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- On the Frontlines of a Warming World, 925 Million Undernourished People
- Peter Thomas Roth Flash Deal: Get $260 Worth of Retinol for $89 and Reduce Wrinkles Overnight
- Energy Production Pushing Water Supply to Choke Point
Recommendation
The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
How the Trump Administration’s Climate Denial Left Its Mark on The Arctic Council
Biden Signs Sweeping Orders to Tackle Climate Change and Rollback Trump’s Anti-Environment Legacy
No Drop in U.S. Carbon Footprint Expected Through 2050, Energy Department Says
What to watch: O Jolie night
WHO questions safety of aspartame. Here's a list of popular foods, beverages with the sweetener.
A Siege of 80 Large, Uncontained Wildfires Sweeps the Hot, Dry West
New York’s Giant Pension Fund Doubles Climate-Smart Investment